[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:37:37 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Nonsense. No contract has been formed. The only claim you can make
> is for violation of copyright. And that's exactly what has been done
> in all cases of pursued GPL violations.
Why don't you quote those cases? Preferably the judges. But feel free
to quote plaintiffs as well. Moglen's bullshiting doesn't count.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Property according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/12
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13