[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:11:41 +0000 |
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 18:39 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> ................................ The dynamic benefit of a property
> right is the incentive that the right imparts to invest in the
> creation or improvement of a resource .........................
> ............................................................
> ...................................... For example, a firm is less
> likely to expend resources on developing a new product if competing
> firms that have not borne the expense of development can duplicate
> the product and produce it at the same marginal cost as the
> innovator; competition will drive price down to marginal cost, and
> the sunk costs of invention will not be recouped.
Nicely put piece of non-sequitor FUD :)
If the history of Free Software proves anything, it's the opposite of
this "theory".
Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, John Hasler, 2006/02/07