[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:09:28 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> I can't see the FSF bleeding just because the court tries to pound
> some coherence into Wallace's claims before dismissing them.
"The GPL allows free access to software programs, subject to some
limitations. This does not mean that the GPL necessarily aids
competition as contemplated by the Sherman Act, as FSF contends."
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alexander Terekhov <=
Re: GPL and other licences, Barry Margolin, 2006/01/31