[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU General Public License?
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GNU General Public License? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:38:10 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Fung writes:
> Assumption: commoncpp library is licensed under GPL
What do you mean by "commoncpp"? Are you trying to refer to the gcc
runtime code? From the relevant copyright file:
The libstdc++-v3 library is licensed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License, with this special exception:
As a special exception, you may use this file as part of a free software
library without restriction. Specifically, if other files instantiate
templates or use macros or inline functions from this file, or you compile
this file and link it with other files to produce an executable, this
file does not by itself cause the resulting executable to be covered by
the GNU General Public License. This exception does not however
invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be covered by
the GNU General Public License.
gpc is copyright Free Software Foundation, and is licensed under the
GNU General Public License which on Debian GNU/Linux systems can be
found as `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
The libgcj library is licensed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License, with this special exception:
As a special exception, if you link this library with other files
to produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause
the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public
License. This exception does not however invalidate any other
reasons why the executable file might be covered by the GNU
General Public License.
gcc/libgcc2.c (source for libgcc) has the following addition:
In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License,
the Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to
link the compiled version of this file into combinations with
other programs, and to distribute those combinations without any
restriction coming from the use of this file. (The General Public
License restrictions do apply in other respects; for example, they
cover modification of the file, and distribution when not linked
into a combine executable.)
gcc/unwind-libunwind.c (source for libgcc) has the following addition:
As a special exception, if you link this library with other files,
some of which are compiled with GCC, to produce an executable,
this library does not by itself cause the resulting executable to
be covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does
not however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file
might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- GNU General Public License?, miguelx6, 2006/01/30
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/30
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Fung, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Fung, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, David Kastrup, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/31
- Re: GNU General Public License?,
John Hasler <=