[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:38:21 +0100 |
Basically, just like the rest of the GPL drivel authored by a
programmer-not-a-lawyer RMS, it has no legal effect whatsoever.
The GNU GPL was crafted by RMS in conjuction with lawyers. And just
like the rest of the GNU GPL, it has a strong legal effect.
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, (continued)
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/18
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, D.C. Parris, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, David Kastrup, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, D.C. Parris, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/19
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Appropriate List for GPL Discussions?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/19