[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 20:38:25 +0000 |
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 20:25 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Marketing to begin with. You should read and try to understand the
> complaint, really.
Yes, really.
Basis of complaint: Wallace seems to think anti-trust law is there to
protect a business model instead of protecting consumers.
His case only makes sense if you think of Free Software as a monopoly.
Laudable effort of waste of time.
Rui
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/04
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/04
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/04
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/01/04
Message not available