[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:44:52 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (OS/2 for ENIAC) |
In article <425BA4EC.6FCD8A0@web.de>, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> My answer is below it. As far as the GPL is concerned, everything is
> compatible with it. It might not be so under jursidiction of the GNU
> Republic (where only Mr President Stallman knows and rules what is
> "compatible"), but who cares?
This makes no sense. If I have some GPL'ed code and some code under license
Foo, and I can combine them in a program in such a way that I can satisfy
they terms of both GPL and Foo, then it makes sense to say they are
compatible. If I cannot do so, then it makes sense to say they are
incompatible.
--
--Tim Smith
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Mike Linksvayer, 2005/04/12
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Tatu Portin, 2005/04/20
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/21
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2005/04/21
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/21
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Isaac, 2005/04/22
- Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/23
Message not availableRe: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/04/21
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/21
Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?, Tatu Portin, 2005/04/14