[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patents again
From: |
Abdullah Ramazanoglu |
Subject: |
Re: Patents again |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:13:50 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) |
begin threeseas dedi ki:
> Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
>> begin Paul Jarc dedi ki:
--8<--
>> A patented idea can be implemented in a project haphazardly, yes, but it
>> would be spotty and probably easy to deal with. But a deliberate, covert
>> plan would provide for a systematic, mass corruption substantially more
>> difficult to deal with. ....
>
> [snip]
>
> and a deliberte, covert plan would also leave a trail of evidence....
>
> do you really think the justice system is so corrupt that it could
> ignore such intent to harm others or their works by such deception?
If you give it a second thought from a wider perspective, then the whole
software patents question should have not existed in the first place
today, if one had to trust the justice (sub)system. Why should I have to
trust the whole basket of eggs to justice subsystem exclusively, instead
of (or in addition to) taking proper care of my own self?
--
Abdullah | aramazan@ |
Ramazanoglu | myrealbox |
________________| D.0.T cöm |__
- Re: Patents again, (continued)
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/11
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/12
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/12
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/14
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/14
- Re: Patents again, Paul Jarc, 2004/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again,
Abdullah Ramazanoglu <=
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/19
Re: Patents again, Paul Barker, 2004/10/17