[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
From: |
John Winters |
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:41:43 +0100 (BST) |
In article <40FBF111.27397406@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
>Steve Firth wrote:
>[...]
>> challenge to GPL. Several of them beleived that it would eb perfectly
>> possible to use GPL'd code and to stick two fingers up at the code
>> creator.
>>
>> <sigh>
>>
>> Lawyers.
>
>IANALB and I also believe in this theory.
I Am Not A Lawyer B......?
>FSF's expansive claims
>are barred by the doctrine of copyright misuse and the doctrine
>of first sale.
Can you expand on this please?
Cheers,
John
--
Wallingford, Oxfordshire, England
i = (free(NULL), i++);
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Hasler, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Winters, 2004/07/19
Message not available
Message not availableRe: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Jason Clifford, 2004/07/19
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Phillips, 2004/07/19
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Jason Clifford, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Phillips, 2004/07/19
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20