[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:07:42 +0200 |
On 06 Jul 2004 10:38:48 +0200
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Strictly speaking, it's not a "verbatim" copy :-)
>
> I fail to see that.
cmp sees it without problems ;-)
Bring your hands to your head, take off your
serious hat, put it on the table. Take the
funny cap, put it on your head, and spin it
so your hair's a tousle. Now look again.
We're not the ones supposed to engage in
pettyfoggery, that's Alexander's privilege.
--
Stefaan
--
"What is stated clearly conceives easily." -- Inspired sales droid
- LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Werner Almesberger, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Brian Gough, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Ben Pfaff, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?,
Stefaan A Eeckels <=
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06