[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plugins and GPL, revisited
|
From: |
Rui Miguel Seabra |
|
Subject: |
Re: plugins and GPL, revisited |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2004 23:05:35 +0100 |
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 11:54 -0700, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> ap85@georgetown.edu (Alexander R. Pruss) wrote in message
> news:<f601968d.0405270632.ce2cab0@posting.google.com>...
> [...]
>
> Expandive FSF´s claims are barred by the doctrine of copyright misuse
> and the doctrine of first sale. Stick to CPL (or EPL if you don´t like
> the patent(s) license termination clause).
That doesn't seem to be the opinion of a large number of cases, where
they infringing parties have greed to settle out of court, usually by
complying with the GPL.
I call your bluff. Don't try to hind behind a curtain of quotes of
quotes with quotes of quotes. Show us some real tdata backing up your
claims or STFU.
Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part