[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library |
|
Date: |
27 May 2004 11:49:14 -0700 |
ap85@georgetown.edu (Alexander R. Pruss) wrote in message
news:<f601968d.0405260448.5c463ca5@posting.google.com>...
> I'd like to distribute GPL code compiled with Borland's C compiler,
> and statically linked with Borland's C library. Is this permitted?
Yes. It is permitted by law.
[...]
> Would it make a difference if I used the newly released free Microsoft
> C compiler and its libs?
No.
> It would be easier to make a case that it's
> a part of the OS, no?
That doesn´t matter. Not everything that the GPL says is lawful.
regards,
alexander.
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Byron A Jeff, 2004/05/26
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Alexander R. Pruss, 2004/05/26
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/05/27
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library,
Alexander Terekhov <=
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/27