[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library
From: |
Byron A Jeff |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library |
Date: |
26 May 2004 13:32:11 -0400 |
In article <x5n03v2vdi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
-ap85@georgetown.edu (Alexander R. Pruss) writes:
-
-> I'd like to distribute GPL code compiled with Borland's C compiler,
-> and statically linked with Borland's C library. Is this permitted?
-
-According to what? The GPL clearly tells you that you have to add the
-source code of your stuff.
David,
I think you missed the point. The OP wants to compile and statically link
GPL code with a proprietary compiler and library. There may not be any new
source code that needs to be distributed.
BAJ
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library,
Byron A Jeff <=
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/26
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Byron A Jeff, 2004/05/28
Re: GPL and statically linking with non-GPL standard C library, Byron A Jeff, 2004/05/26