[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk"
From: |
Tim Tyler |
Subject: |
Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk" |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2004 18:54:50 GMT |
Seeking Twine <any@twine.for.me> wrote or quoted:
> Right. The whole Linux Development community is afraid anything that
> impinges on the power of the 'c' development hierarchy. In some sense,
> the whole OSS/Linux movement is a reassertion of the procedural
> programmers against the Object programmers.
>
> That's the real battle, and don't let them tell you different.
Stigmata involving the equating Linux with procedural C programming are
usually a sign of a pathetic windroid attempt to give Microsoft
some sort of moral high ground.
Unfortunately, Microsoft themselves have been foisting old and crappy
languages on their developers for years - while carrying out FUD campaigns
against more recently-developed languages - such as Java.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply.
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Seeking Twine, 2004/05/21
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk",
Tim Tyler <=
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Linønut, 2004/05/21
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", anoncoward, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Guess My Sphincta, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", anoncoward, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Rob S. Pierre, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Guess My Sphincta, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Rolf Tollerud, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Jango Johnny, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", asj, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Jango Johnny, 2004/05/24