[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???
From: |
PrussianSnow |
Subject: |
RE: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ??? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 20:57:34 +0100 |
>I never said it's not readable. Just that readability is not the main
>concern. Having a "self-describing" "text" representation is the main
>concern. Readability is pretty secondary.
One thing I do like about XML is that in 5, 10 or even 50 years when some
poor programmer is faced with the task of reserecting my data as long as she
figures out ASCII she'll probably get the data. This is /very/ important to
people like me and that's the level of readability I'm personally concerned
with.
Ereth.
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, (continued)
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, mlw, 2004/05/18
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Michael Vondung, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, David Kastrup, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Ministry Of Jute, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Ministry Of Jute, 2004/05/19
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/19
- RE: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???,
PrussianSnow <=
- Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Christopher Browne, 2004/05/19
Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Christopher Browne, 2004/05/19
Re: Why Don't 'We' Talk about XML ???, Phillip Lord, 2004/05/20