[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 18:36:46 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.6.4 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> Microsoft Loses Patent Suit
...
>Now tell me: if there wasn't a patent system, what do you think would
>have happened to Stac?
Does anybody really care? Stac's patents were of dubious innovative
value to begin with.
The point that is repeatedly lost on those who defend the current patent
system is: Nobody reads patents for the purpose of learning new things.
--
Rahul
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, (continued)
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, T . Max Devlin, 2004/05/13
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, David, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Martha H Adams, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Cargill, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Howard Goldstein, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, phil hunt, 2004/05/15
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, phil hunt, 2004/05/15
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, AES/newspost, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/14
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, phil hunt, 2004/05/15
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/15
- Re: Gates Patents Flipping a Light Switch, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/15