[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL Software Gold Standard
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL Software Gold Standard |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 20:23:00 +0200 |
Martin Dickopp wrote:
[...]
> I asked you already several postings ago a number /concrete/ questions
> to find out which part of my characterisation of the article you think
Your "characterisation" of the article was nothing but spin. It is
clear indictation that your arguments (if any) suck and you know it.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, (continued)
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/12
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/13
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/13
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/13
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/13
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/13
Re: GPL Software Gold Standard, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/12