[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The patent process
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: The patent process |
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 2004 22:13:57 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> In theory, you, as a skilled practitioner of the art, are supposed to be
> able to know when something you have developed qualifies as potentially
> new, useful, and unobvious and be able to do a search for applicable
That's not enough. You also have to watch out for patents that cover stuff
that were novel in their days but are obvious now.
Stefan
- Re: The patent process, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/14
- Re: The patent process, David Kastrup, 2004/05/14
- Re: The patent process, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/14
Re: The patent process, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13