[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending]
From: |
AES/newspost |
Subject: |
The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending] |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:35:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC) |
A patent is a government action -- certainly not a law or an agency
regulation in the usual sense, but a government action with the force of
law and enforceable through the judicial system, that grants rights to
some, takes away rights from others. Each issued patent is, in effect
and to most intents and purposes, a mini piece of legislation, or a mini
regulation.
Can anyone think of any other legislative or regulatory processes in
which a law or government regulation is issued at the request of and for
the benefit of an interested individual and:
* The content of the proposed legislation or regulation is kept more or
less absolutely secret from all other potentially interested parties for
as much as the first18 months of its consideration; and
* Other interested parties are not allowed to comment at all on the
proposed legislation in any event until after it has issued and taken on
the force of law (no public hearings, no requests for public comment of
any kind); and
* The issuing agency will not consider any comments or relevant
information that any other interested party may try to supply before
issuance; and
* Even after issuance any interested party has to pay a substantial fee
($8000) just to offer comment or information regarding the already
issued law or regulation; and
* Doing so may have significant negative impact on the judicial rights
of any individual who offers such comment and is subsequently accused of
infringing the same law or regulation?
--------------
[Off-topic postscript: I suppose many of the Bush administration's
energy, environmental, defense and other legislative and regulatory
policies fall under the first and third of the items above, but not the
others.]
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, (continued)
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Bernd Jendrissek, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, John Bailo, 2004/05/10
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Henry E Schaffer, 2004/05/09
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/09
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Alun, 2004/05/09
- The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending],
AES/newspost <=
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Al Dente, 2004/05/10
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/10
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], A Waterfall That Barks, 2004/05/10
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11