[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending
From: |
Hamilcar Barca |
Subject: |
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending |
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2004 21:43:53 -0600 |
In article <aab17256.0405071903.421eb0e7@posting.google.com> (Fri, 07 May
2004 20:03:16 -0700), Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote in message
> news:<barmar-D88617.18415607052004@comcast.ash.giganews.com>...
>> I thought "the desktop" referred to features of a graphical user
>> interface. Sure, it's a metaphor for things that existed 30 years ago,
>> but the metaphor itself didn't exist then.
>
> Didn't Xerox PARC have something along those lines over 30 years ago?
Yes. Smalltalk-72 had a "desktop" but I'm nearly 100% certain it didn't
have the concepts of "user" or "switching" or whatever Microsoft's claims
involve.
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, (continued)
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Daniel R. Tobias, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Daeron, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Daniel R. Tobias, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending,
Hamilcar Barca <=
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/08
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Dan Ganek, 2004/05/07
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Peter Köhlmann, 2004/05/08
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Christopher C. Stacy, 2004/05/08
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Dan Ganek, 2004/05/08
- Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, John, 2004/05/08