[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending
From: |
pltrgyst |
Subject: |
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending |
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2004 22:03:23 -0400 |
On 07 May 2004 18:35:44 +0200, LEE Sau Dan <danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
wrote:
> .... that's not stopping Microsoft from
> theodp> seeking a patent for 'Methods and arrangements for
> theodp> providing multiple concurrent desktops and workspaces in a
> theodp> shared computing environment,' the USPTO disclosed
> theodp> Thursday.
>
>If this paragraph is really disclosed by the USPTO, then that clearly
>indicates that the USPTO is aware that there are plentiful prior art.
>Why are they still entertaining M$?
The meat of a patent is the claims. They are what may be issued or denied. They
are what is contestable in court.
To evaluate the scope of this application, you need to analyze the claims very
carefully, with particular emphasis on the term "concurrent."
All the discussion here thus far is pointless, politically-correct hot air.
-- Larry
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], (continued)
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/10
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, LEE Sau Dan, 2004/05/07
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Paul Hovnanian P.E., 2004/05/07
Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending, Daniel R. Tobias, 2004/05/07