[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proper way of packaging a GPLed perl script
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: proper way of packaging a GPLed perl script |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 12:20:17 -0800 (PST) |
I used GPLed perl scripts all the time.
The best way IMHO is to
1. Create an MakeMaker package
2. Use that to create a PPM and a tgz distribution.
3. From that you can create a debian package and a RPM
for installing.
That way the user has many ways to install, but a
makemaker and a tgz would be the minimum.
Check www.perlmonks.org and search for packaging and
makemaker for lots of information.
mike
--- ichudov@ak47.algebra.com wrote:
> I wrote a perl script for downloading of very large
> multipart binaries
> posted to usenet. (not for porn pictures, but for
> things like movies,
> ISO images, etc). The script is actually quite smart
> in what it does.
>
> I want to make it available for the general public,
> however I am not
> sure how to package it properly. Right now, it
> creates (and requires)
> several subdirectories under the current
> directories:
>
> nfo/
> cache/
> download/
> etc/
>
> is that appropriate?
>
> It also requires several perl modules.
>
> One question is, should I package he modules with it
> or let the users
> install it?
>
> igor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
> Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
>
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
=====
James Michael DuPont
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/