gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1712352] freenix endorsed ?


From: Therese Godefroy via RT
Subject: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1712352] freenix endorsed ?
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 03:44:18 -0400

Hello Jean and Bill,

Thanks for your detailed answers. I forwarded the original message
to Don Robertson, since moving tickets to the Licensing queue is
inefficient most of the time.

Best,
Thérèse


Le Mar 06 Avr 2021 16:57:19, bugs@gnu.support a écrit :
> * Therese Godefroy via RT <webmasters-comment@gnu.org> [2021-04-06
> 18:59]:
> > Hello Linux-libre people,
> >
> > Another one... Thanks!
> >
> > Thérèse
> >
> > Le Lun 05 Avr 2021 11:41:10, walidslack@gmail.com a écrit :
> > > Hello guys it's me again.
> > > The developper Freenix wait from longtime their distribution be
> > > endorsed.
> > > I can see to libreplanet :
> > > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Incoming_distros
> > > You should finish this work and we will a new distribution to the
> > > list
> > > based to Slackware.
> > > https://freenix.net/
> 
> Developers of Freenix should participate. Are you one of them?
> 
> I wish to see Freenix included in the FSF list of fully free and
> endorsed GNU/Linux distributions. Since PureOS we did not see new one
> coming. We should rush.
> 
> What I don't understand is the mentioning of these packages which are
> non-free:
> https://freenix.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=slackware_14.0
> 
> What is very hard to find on that website is:
> 
> - Packages, package list or search of packages, as that is starting
>   point to verify if there are some considered non-free or
>   non-compliant to FSF Free Distribution Guidelines
> 
> - Issues -- I have seen it, but I missed it, it is very hard to find
>   issues. That is one of requirements.
> 
> Jean







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]