[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1712352] freenix endorsed ?
From: |
Therese Godefroy via RT |
Subject: |
[GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1712352] freenix endorsed ? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Apr 2021 03:44:18 -0400 |
Hello Jean and Bill,
Thanks for your detailed answers. I forwarded the original message
to Don Robertson, since moving tickets to the Licensing queue is
inefficient most of the time.
Best,
Thérèse
Le Mar 06 Avr 2021 16:57:19, bugs@gnu.support a écrit :
> * Therese Godefroy via RT <webmasters-comment@gnu.org> [2021-04-06
> 18:59]:
> > Hello Linux-libre people,
> >
> > Another one... Thanks!
> >
> > Thérèse
> >
> > Le Lun 05 Avr 2021 11:41:10, walidslack@gmail.com a écrit :
> > > Hello guys it's me again.
> > > The developper Freenix wait from longtime their distribution be
> > > endorsed.
> > > I can see to libreplanet :
> > > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Incoming_distros
> > > You should finish this work and we will a new distribution to the
> > > list
> > > based to Slackware.
> > > https://freenix.net/
>
> Developers of Freenix should participate. Are you one of them?
>
> I wish to see Freenix included in the FSF list of fully free and
> endorsed GNU/Linux distributions. Since PureOS we did not see new one
> coming. We should rush.
>
> What I don't understand is the mentioning of these packages which are
> non-free:
> https://freenix.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=slackware_14.0
>
> What is very hard to find on that website is:
>
> - Packages, package list or search of packages, as that is starting
> point to verify if there are some considered non-free or
> non-compliant to FSF Free Distribution Guidelines
>
> - Issues -- I have seen it, but I missed it, it is very hard to find
> issues. That is one of requirements.
>
> Jean