gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:10:35 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.28.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

bill-auger <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:50:02 +0100 Marius wrote:
>> That message says we are no longer using a _fork_ of
>> Ungoogled-Chromium. Earlier revisions of the patch was pulling from
>> my repository[0], now we use the canonical upstream repository
>> directly:
>
> but then what do you do to the upstream sources? - we all agree the
> upstream sources are not FSDG-free - arent the ungoogled patches the
> keystone of your liberation procedure?

The liberation procedure is right there in the package definition:

<https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/chromium.scm#n229>.

This script is what creates the FSDG-free source tarball presented to
users when they run `guix build --source ungoogled-chromium`.

> that is entirely why i am confused now - it would help tremendously if
> you could tell us what you did to the upstream sources that you believe
> makes the FSDG-free - like a liberation recipe in plain english would
> be awseome

There are comments in the script.  Please ask if any of the steps are
unclear!  Improvements welcome.

> this audit would be an incredibly difficult task even with your full
> co-operation

I don't understand this statement.  We all know it's an extremely
difficult task.  I have done a large part of it and am glad that others
are joining in.  Do you feel that I have not been cooperative?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]