[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:09:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Julie
this is how it was explained to me - i was a bit mixed up yesterday
myself - but henry's first message today made it clear
the main problem is not so much mentioning the name of the blob but that
the message is presented as an error - "failed to load this blob" - that
gives the impression that the user has done something wrong by "failing"
to acquire that blob
i had never actually seen that error - so what i found puzzling
yesterday looking at the pureos patch was that it was only a (W) warning
and did not actually read like a hard error - now i understand the
pureos patch not only doesnt address the problem but it is not even in
the same package where the problem exists
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, (continued)
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Henry Jensen, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Julie Marchant, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Jason Self, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Henry Jensen, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Jason Self, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Henry Jensen, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Julie Marchant, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Jason Self, 2018/03/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity,
bill-auger <=
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Donald Robertson, 2018/03/26
Message not availableRe: [GNU-linux-libre] DSFG in perpetuity, Luke, 2018/03/28