[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] libglvnd: OK or not?
From: |
André Silva |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] libglvnd: OK or not? |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:37:31 +0000 |
On 03/31/2017 08:17 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 08:04 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 03:13:23 -0400,
>> André Silva wrote:
>>> It's my suggestion:
>>>
>>> a) Keep official Arch's mesa (with libglvnd support) unblacklisted.
>>> b) Use coadde's version as alternative one with another name in PCR (eg.
>>> mesa-vanilla)
>>
>> I like that.
>
> Yes, i think it is the best way for everyone :)
I forgot about drirc that contains support (maybe an "implicit"
recommendation too) to use non-Free Software.[0] I think it's enough to
warrant keeping libre/mesa :(
[0]:https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/plain/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature