gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] choosealicense.com fork with better wording, perha


From: hellekin
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] choosealicense.com fork with better wording, perhaps ?
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:05:36 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/19/2014 06:09 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>
> freedom to murder
> 
*** Wait, what?  Look, you need to learn about ethics.  Specifically,
you need to understand the difference between positive freedom and
negative freedom.  Software freedom is about positive freedom, i.e. not
about "restrictions".  Neoliberal, neocon, libertarian-Randian
propagandas are all about negative freedom, i.e. the freedom of an
individual to do anything they like, including, e.g. to terminate other
people's freedom (as in your example: murder).  As long as you can't
make this difference, you cannot grasp the concept of software freedom.

Objectivity is itself propaganda: it supposes an objective subject,
which is a contradiction.  One can tend to objectivity, but since the
XXth Century and the Theory of Relativity, science knows that the
observer influences the observation.  So in any case, what you tell
about licensing is necessarily propaganda.  "Journalist objectivity" is
said to tell the facts.  But how you tell the facts, and what facts you
tell (and therefore, what facts you omit) frame a discourse in a certain
way.  If you want to make an objective account of free software
licenses, you must start with understanding the underlying concepts.
You can't be objective about something if you can't understand it.  When
some people reject Evolution, they can't be objective.  They simply
reject Evolution.  Now, one can prefer Lynn Margulis' Theory of
Evolution to Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, and that's a
different matter.  But you can't say "objectively" something like: "Man
comes from monkey who comes from a tree."  That's misunderstanding
Darwin's Theory of Evolution.  In the same way, you can't say that the
GPL "restricts" people's freedom-to-restrict-other-people's-freedom:
that's not objective, and that's non-sense.

That said, I do think that the user interface of choosealicense.com is a
good way for someone to choose a license, and
license-recommendations.html is a different thing entirely, not only
content-wise, but primarily at the level of user experience.  Maybe the
FSF should "fork" the site and rectify the propaganda to lean on the
side of positive freedom.

Another note on "freedom to murder": that's the kind of propaganda that
is pervasive in our globalizing civilization to justify all kinds of
dumbass bullying corporate agenda.  It's like saying: in order to allow
the construction industry to increase their profit--and support their
"freedom to profit", we should bomb a city or two once in a while.  It's
obviously wrong, and confusing ends and means, and reversing the purpose
of anything: let's kill people to solve the unemployment issue. WTF.

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=KS+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]