> source of linux libre is linux, and is not free
> source of icecat is firefox and we are seeing that is not free
Source of Linux-libre is Linux-libre, completely free:
http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/selibre/linux-
libre/download/releases/LATEST-2.6.39.0/linux-2.6.39-libre.tar.bz2
Source of GNU IceCat, again completely free:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/5.0/icecat-5.0.tar.bz2
that files are not sources, sources are in linux project and mozilla proyects. Linuxlibre and ice-cat are usefull, to aloud people to use only free software without restrictions, to know what happens in each machine (blobs) (if they have the hardware) or to aloud to sell software, but they don' t provide sources. They provide a sub product of the real sources, that are not free. A restricted set of software that is free.
these files are modified by hand or in automatic way (like kernel in ututo), bur are not sources
call them sources is like call sources a grammar in c produced by yacc/bisson
there are not legaly sources, and is not a good idea to think of them as a new project, becouse the people that really do the code are not in linux-libre nor in ice cat project. They are not new projects, nor forks, and continue to be that way, each new version is constructed from a new version of the very sources. Only one criterion: remove non free, restrict the universo of machines to the one in wich only free soft. could be run.
--