Re: [GNU-linux-libre] more http://libreplanet.org/wiki?title=NONFSDG stuff

[Karl Goetz]

On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:08:51 +0200
Sam Geeraerts <address@hidden> wrote:

> Brett Smith schreef:
> > Maybe it would be most useful to add something like an optional
> > "Related package names" field to the infobox we're already using?
> > And this could intentionally be a little vague/flexible, so that it
> > could be useful for all these cases: variant package names for
> > specific versions or distros (like firefox-3.0), one entry for all
> > the troublesome metapackages, one entry for both bnetd and pvpgn,
> > etc.
> 
> Indeed. I think the heading should be the software name (e.g.
> Mac-on-Linux emulator) and then a "Packages" field can list the
> package name(s) in the distros (e.g. mol).

hm,
not a bad thought. if someone wants to update the template it sounds
like a good way forward.
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature