gnu-crypto-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: request for comments (long)


From: Raif S. Naffah
Subject: Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: request for comments (long)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 08:49:53 +1100
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

hello Mark,

On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:54, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 10:27, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> > ...putting
> > the gnu.crypto.xxx test classes under the gnu.testlet folder,
> > amending the 'choose' script, and Makefile.am to use a
> > $(project_so) seem to do the job.  i'll wait and see if others
> > suggest different alternatives/ideas before deciding which way to
> > jump.
>
> But I don't like Mauves configury/setup magic. Note that I once made
> some scripts that make using Mauve simpler (when you have a GNU
> system with bash).
> See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2002-q3/msg00019.html
>
> If these seem useful to you then I can import them into Mauve.

i havent looked very closely, but i like the way the process is broken 
into atomic steps.


>... You
> can then just use Mauve as upstream provider of your testframework. I
> wouldn't worry to much about having two copies of those files in
> different CVS trees. Both Mauve and GNU Crypto see active development
> but both groups of developers know each other, or are sometimes even
> the same people :) And the basic framework doesn't change that much
> anyway...

fine.  i'll add the Mauve classes and scripts to the GNU Crypto CVS and 
intergate locally.  make check in GNU Crypto should then run the mauve 
tests.


cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE9+lYJ+e1AKnsTRiERA1nEAJ9plVZ36BmkRbwP9o3qdtUxqpIDUQCdFS6q
oggM+t48IqT2K3JGqCdkCGw=
=kvn9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]