[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats
From: |
Matthew Hannigan |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:54:12 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
(my first reply prob went to just Tom due to my stuff up, so here it is again,
almost.)
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 08:53:40AM -0800, Thomas Lord wrote:
> * First: is there a nicer (closer to plain-text, more directly legible)
> simple syntax for XML in general?
http://yaml.org
Anyway I think you're trying to solve a problem that
doesn't need solving for the purposes of arch docs.
Not it in the medium term anyway. We can fix it later
if needed with some eyeballing and programming.
YAGNI, simplicity is its own reward etc ...
Matt
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: doc formats, Thomas Lord, 2006/01/23