[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions
From: |
Matthew Palmer |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:01:59 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:28:31PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> So, as a note, if you send source code patches in for tla, you give the
> permission for this licensing condition :-)
You can't make the assumption that someone has read this message (and agreed
to it!) before they send their patch. If the licence isn't clear from the
contribution, you need to bounce the patch with a "please clarify licence;
we only accept GPLv2+later" comment.
- Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] contributors' licensing conditions, Andy Tai, 2006/01/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions,
Matthew Palmer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions, Andy Tai, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: contributors' licensing conditions, Haakon Riiser, 2006/01/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] GNU Hurd, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] GNU Hurd, Haakon Riiser, 2006/01/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] GNU Hurd, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] GNU Hurd, Andy Tai, 2006/01/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] GNU Hurd, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/18