[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help
From: |
Andrew Bennetts |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:54:14 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:39:22AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > All of these are minor improvments, and nothing significant. For
> > tla you had `tla-fork', and `tla-switch'.
>
> No you didn't, they were NOT part of tla.
>
> Not directly, but then, baz was never part of tla, so your point is
> completely moot, irrelevant, and you are looking for a flame.
?
The discussion here, I thought, was comparing baz to tla. branch and switch are
part of baz, but weren't part of tla. Surely this is relevant?
> If I add a new option, or an alias for a old one, that is not a
> significant change. That is the only change baz did, add some aliases
This is not true, changes beyond simple aliasing and new options were made.
I've explicitly listed some in a previous mail, as well as given you this URL:
http://wiki.gnuarch.org/BazaarVsTla which also describes changes other than
trivial tweaks to commands, and even so is not a complete list -- e.g. it
doesn't discuss the improvements to gpg signing configuration.
For that matter, new commands like "baz resolved" (and the accompanying "baz
status --conflicts") may not be terribly complicated, but in terms of improved
user experience, it's significant.
> or change the behaviour of a very small subset of options. Such
> changes are not significant. I find it amazing that some people here
> have such grave reading difficulties.
I find it amazing that you completely discount first-hand reports of improved
user experience (either that, or you have grave reading difficulties...).
-Andrew.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Andrew Bennetts, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Andrew Bennetts, 2006/01/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Matthew Linus Hannigan, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Matthew Hannigan, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, James Blackwell, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help,
Andrew Bennetts <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, James Blackwell, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Michael Poole, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Michael Poole, 2006/01/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, Matthieu Moy, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, Matthieu Moy, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, Andy Tai, 2006/01/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, Matthieu Moy, 2006/01/17