[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH impleme
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:03:21 +0100 |
> Secondly, tla will attempt to automatically detect one of these 4
> sftp versions by trying the binaries in the order 'ssh', 'lshc',
> 'whatever-the-binary-for-fsecure' and 'psftp' (or the other way
> around for the last two?), attempting to auto-detect which
> version of the program is being used. This means that even if you
> symlink 'lshc' to 'openssh', tla will do the right thing.
Argh!? No auto-detection! The less magic that happens the better for
all involved. You can always wrap this around in a special command
that you supply in the variable ARCH_SFTP (or whatever) variable,
something like:
if [ -x /bin/ssh ]; then
T=ssh
elif [ -X /bin/lsh ]; then
T=lsh
elfif [ -x /bin/lshc ]; then # Debian stupidity.
T=lshc
else
echo "No secure telnet client found!"
exit 1
fi
exec $T "$@"
Note that for GNUish reasons, I promoted lsh as the first choice.
:-)
AOL!
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Andy Tai, 2006/01/10
Message not available
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Andy Tai, 2006/01/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] Support for several SSH implementations, Andy Tai, 2006/01/19