[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:11:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.8i |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:15:09 -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
>
> From: Jan Hudec <address@hidden>
>
> > The problem here is, that the indices only contain full path from root
> > to the files and their IDs, but not IDs of the parent directories.
>
> > You're ahead of me in diagnosis, if you are right (and I'm working
> > mostly on other things for the next few days).
>
> Looking at orig-files-index and mod-files-index (and respective -dirs-)
> in a changeset, that adds a file, I only see 2 columns: the full name
> and id of the file. Since there is no other ID and since the dirs inices
> are empty (so the ids can't be infered from there), I see no way to find
> the ids, which is how I came to the above conclusion. Perhaps I am missing
> something.
>
> Suppose that one line in `mod-*-index' contains an entry for a
> newly added file and another line contanis an entry for the dir
> where that file was added. Since both are in the `mod' tree, `dopatch'
> can figure out (on the basis of paths) the id of the directory in which
> the new file was added.
>
> E.g., given MOD entries:
>
> a/b x_b_id
>
>
> a x_a_id
>
> where `x_b_id' is a new file or dir, we know that `x_b_id' wants to be
> added in the directory whose id is `x_a_id', no matter what that
> directory happens to be called.
Yes, that _would_ be enough. However, looking at actual patch that adds
files into existing, tagged directory, the directory is not mentioned in
mod-files-index nor mod-dirs-index.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Tom Lord, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Jan Hudec, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Tom Lord, 2005/03/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control,
Jan Hudec <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Tom Lord, 2005/03/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Tom Lord, 2005/03/29
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Tom Lord, 2005/03/29
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [arch advocacy] Games from Within: litmus test for revision control, Magnus Therning, 2005/03/30