[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:26:30PM +0600, Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
> > If someone finds a second pre-image attack against md5, then arch
> > will be in trouble (but so will just about anything else).
>
> MD5 is considered insecure for many years. Arch is already in trouble
> because Arch developers do not understand security.
>
> I am not security expert too, but designing security attack against
> Arch took less time than writing this message.
This is pure nonsense. Go away and read /Beyond Fear/, and maybe
/Secrets & Lies/ as well. And CRYPTO-GRAM too, while you're at
it. I've seen journalists with better comprehension of security.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] MD5 is broken, Ivan Boldyrev, 2005/03/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] MD5 is broken, Matthew Dempsky, 2005/03/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Ivan Boldyrev, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Karel Gardas, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Jan Hudec, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Tom Lord, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Karel Gardas, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Tom Lord, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Matthew Dempsky, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Andrew Suffield, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Karel Gardas, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Peter Conrad, 2005/03/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: MD5 is broken, Karel Gardas, 2005/03/16