[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update
From: |
Mikhael Goikhman |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:35:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 08 Feb 2005 17:03:39 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> So:
>
> add
> rm (alias: remove?)
> mv (alias: move, rename)
>
> add-id
> remove-id
> move-id
The list I posted in "[BUG] Rethinking .." message is similar, but has a
serious advantage, it matches the names cvs and svn uses. This is good,
it is not like these cvs-like names conflict with any arch concepts.
Moreover, "delete-id" is a better term than "remove-id", because arch
already uses this name, and produces 'D' in "changes" output. In fact,
"R" is used in baz to mean "rename", not "remove"... And "M" means file
modification and not "move", but there is nothing to do about this one.
As for having "add-id", I see no reason to do this, there is no any
confusion about what "add" does. But if "add-id" makes anyone (you)
happy, such alias may be added to the list I posted.
Personally I believe in aliases, so it is not very important here
whether the main spelling is "delete" and "move", or "rm" and "mv".
Regards,
Mikhael.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Miles Bader, 2005/02/06
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch status update, Miles Bader, 2005/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update,
Mikhael Goikhman <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, mlh, 2005/02/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, conrad, 2005/02/07
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Miles Bader, 2005/02/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2005/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands., Gustavo Córdova Avila, 2005/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Tom Lord, 2005/02/08
Message not available