[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:38:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:25:22PM -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2004, at 16:06, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> >Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag
> >equivalent,
> >binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)?
>
> There has been discussion of binary diffs a while back, but I don't
> remember quite what came out of it.
Arch already has the only kind of binary diff that is possible.
It would be possible to compress the changesets better but there is
little demand for this, to the point where nobody cares enough to do
it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Tom Browder, 2004/12/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Thomas Lord, 2004/12/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/06