[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Newbie confusion "illegal revision name"
From: |
Andrew Wilcox |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Newbie confusion "illegal revision name" |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:39:14 -0400 |
I wrote:
> As I learn arch, a few times I've tried to specify a revision, but
> didn't realize it needed to be fully qualified.
> ...
> A hint in the error message such as "not a valid fully qualified
> revision name" would be helpful.
Aaron Bentley replied:
> "patch-3" is a patchlevel, not a revision name of any kind.
I understand, though I will point out (as a new user to arch) that the
following did seem to suggest to me that these were revisions within
the version:
$ tla revisions
base-0
patch-1
patch-2
patch-3
> So your proposed changes would be incorrect.
I agree that I don't know what the correct wording is, as I'm new to
arch.
However, I did not understand the error message "illegal revision
name", even after reading the tutorial and the on-line help. Thus I
stand by my suggestion that the error message be improved.
Thank you,
Andrew Wilcox
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Newbie confusion "illegal revision name",
Andrew Wilcox <=