[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sharing local archive problems
From: |
Colin Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sharing local archive problems |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:20:33 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040916) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Patrick wrote:
| Colin Fox wrote:
|
|
|>Another advantage to a shared group is that you can remove people from
|>the group, whereas if you have a shared key, and you don't want someone
|>to have access any more, you'd have to re-key & reissue the key (and
|>make sure you remember where all those keys are used!).
|
|
| Not true. You could just remove one person's key from the
| authorized_keys file.
|
| Cameron.
Good point.
My initial reaction was that you'd lose track of who made which change,
but that isn't actually true, since that is all stored in the changeset.
So, then is there some advantage to one technique over the other? A
developer group vs a shared account with authorized keys?
cf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBbfCAoaQ1/feGlJoRAnynAJ9ye7wTquX0JToD/oUJ8wuPhYo3dACfekNR
NgPwfRaThnmERk1VVQ0LfHw=
=Dv7L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sharing local archive problems, Charles Duffy, 2004/10/12