[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and autotools projects.
From: |
Magnus Therning |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and autotools projects. |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:09:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:10:00PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 15:05:26 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> >> configure --foo=bar
>>
>> > You can make it yourself. It's really trivial:
>>
>> > #!/bin/sh
>> > ./configure "$@"
>>
>> Hmmm.... the discussion here is about how to deal with not having
>> `configure' and other auto-generated files in the repository.
>
>That's easy. Just don't put them there ;-).
>
>Developer should never run configure -- developer runs ./autogen.sh.
>The user on the other hand does not check out from arch directly -- the
>user downloads a release tarball, that has the files generated.
Exactly. The important thing is to realise that you can (relatively)
safely put more pressure on developers than on users.
I'd recommend taking a look at any big opensource project that does use
the auto-tools to see how they've solved it, GNOME, KDE, Samba, etc. It
seems almost all opensource projects use the auto-tools (tla being a
notable exception :-)
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
address@hidden
http://magnus.therning.org/
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
-- Anonymous Psychopath on Slashdot
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and autotools projects., James Blackwell, 2004/08/25