[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: the state of the union
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: the state of the union |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:53:34 +0900 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> For one thing, we need changeset orientation. The Subversion users
> are visibly feeling the pain of its absense. All of the other
> systems are changeset oriented.
I thought that "changeset orientation" just meant that all changes to a
source tree can be committed to the repository as an atomic step, and
these atomic steps have convenient names.
Doesn't subversion have this...?
-Miles
--
`There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'
- [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/18
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: the state of the union,
Miles Bader <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Greg Hudson, 2004/08/18
Message not available