[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Feature plans .... external references
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Feature plans .... external references |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2004 17:22:05 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> >> But doesn't the `fork' step require write access to the
> >> address@hidden archive? This is more a question about `fork' I guess,
> >> but mypoint is that it's important for `fork' to be able to make a
fork in
> >> some other archive, which also means that it can't so easily benefit
from
> >> the "downstream branch" feature (unless that feature is extended so it
can
> >> relate two branches in two different archives).
> > No, `fork' in that case would create the new branch in the user's
> > default archive.
> Hmm... so it's not going to be a "downstream branch" :-(
It should be, in some sense.
cat--+X-$(mangle FQ-VSN)--x.y
should be reserved in the branch namespace for downstream branches of
different archives.
-t
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- merge request headers, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/05/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- merge request headers, Bug Goo, 2004/05/29