Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] changes should run tree-lint like commit

[William Dode]

Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:

> Severity: wishlist
>
> A common idiom is to run 'tla changes' before committing, to aid in
> writing log entries and check the tree is in a suitable state. This
> would be more useful if it called tree-lint in the same manner as
> commit, so that it gives you a better summary of the state of the
> tree. (Non-fatal warnings from tree-lint, at the start of a commit,
> come too late to be useful).
>
> I have lost count of the number of times that I've run 'changes' in an
> implicit tree with 'untagged-source source', observed files being
> added, and committed, only to find out that one of them doesn't have a
> proper id tag.

i thought also that an option --simulate would be great for each
commands who record somethings.

-- 
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net