[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
From: |
John Goerzen |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:04:40 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:05:08PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> If you mean within tla, no -- although it seems a trivially simple
> solution it is not one I'd like to use.
Can't gpg be told to write the decrypted/verified data out once it's
been processed? In that case, it would write out the content of the
verified part, which you could then process.
-- John
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Geert Stappers, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, James Blackwell, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, James Blackwell, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/22