[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?
From: |
conrad |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:31:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:33:12AM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> Pick your favorite generic XML-diff/patch tool and tell me under what
> conditions it is
>
> (a) guaranteed to produce an XML document valid under that DTD when
> applying diffs between meta.xml versions A and B to a meta.xml
> version C.
>
> (c) guaranteed to produce a meta.xml output which is not only valid
> but useful
Are you aware that the standard diff/patch tools don't have these properties
wrt e. g. C-sourcecode? They just happen to work most of the time, which
seems to be enough to make them useful.
I think a general way to assign different types to files could be very
useful. Not only for XML but also for other types, like e. g. natural
language documents.
The special case of XML-diff/patch could be solved e. g. with an XSLT-based
mechanism for useful merges...
Bye,
Peter
--
Peter Conrad | "Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me to your .signature,
Friedensallee 152 | pleeeeeeeeeze!" - found in someone else's .signature
63263 Neu-Isenburg
Germany
email: address@hidden / WWW: http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~conrad
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Robin Farine, 2003/12/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Generic data/validation formats [Was Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?], Charles Duffy, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Generic data/validation formats [Was Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?], Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?,
conrad <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22