[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?
From: |
Momchil Velikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch? |
Date: |
23 Dec 2003 10:24:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:
Andrew> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 07:51:12AM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>> >>= Tom Lord
>>
>> >> On the one hand, sure, you could abstract the `cmp' and
>> >> conceptually the world doesn't fall apart.
>>
>> >> But on the other hand, that would mean (for example) that `get'
>> >> would sometimes return a tree whose source files are not
>> >> byte-wise equivalent to those that were passed to `commit'.
>> >> It's a pretty big leap of faith to think that that's desirable.
>>
>> >= Thomas Zander
>>
>> > If a file is an honest XML file I fail to see why this would be a problem;
>>
>> Because it also an honest regular byte-stream file. For example,
>> a typical md5-sum program will see it as such.
Andrew> Oops, there goes cryptographic signatures.
Unless computed on a cannonical form.
~velco
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Charles Duffy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?,
Momchil Velikov <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/19
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/19