Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Changelog and branches

[Samium Gromoff]

At Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:44:48 -0500,
Jason McCarty wrote:
> 
> [pardon for the snippage]
> 
> Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > As somebody who gets to parse tla`s output i wholeheartedly support your
> > resistance to uglification of supposedly machine-parsable data.
> 
> I believe the discussion was about shortening the automatically-
> generated intended-for-human-consumption changelogs, not the patchlogs
> arch needs to make use of. Those automated tools should probably be
> using the patchlogs. I'm surprised noone corrected this misunderstanding
> earlier -- if it were about changing the patchlog format, I'd probably
> agree with you.

Ok. then. My fault was in not reading carefully enough into the issue brought 
up.

> Jason

regards, Samium Gromoff