[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: get-patch/show-changeset -> inconsistent or no?
From: |
Damien Elmes |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: get-patch/show-changeset -> inconsistent or no? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:45:16 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> `cset' seems like a word to uset
Was that meant to be 'use'? or what's a 'uset'?
> -- `cat' operations just dump what's already text to stdout, but
> show-changeset does something quite different).
Yeah, fair enough. I could live with 'show-cset' ;-)
Though I'd probably prefer the commands be grouped by
category-action, rather than action-category - ie:
cset-show
cset-get
This is how some commands are arranged, but not others, ie add-log vs
log-ls. Emacs has the same problem with consistency in its commands. I
think if there was a standard approach, it'd be a bit easier to pick
up the commands / remember them.
Cheers,
--
Damien Elmes
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] get-patch/show-changeset -> inconsistent or no?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/18
[Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/18