[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use?
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:48:17 +1000 |
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:30, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see these cscvs trees:
>
> address@hidden/cscvs--duff--1.0
> address@hidden/cscvs--devel--1.0
> address@hidden/cscvs--devel--1.0
>
> Which one do people suggest using? What would you consider as the
> primary difference between them?
majors was the original.
cduffy has been going for performance.
I've been going for usability and reliability.
My branch has a fully usable totla (as of this morning). Until last
week, I was still using larch, and hadn't encountered the totla
brokenness.
I think cduffy is merging my changes into cscvs--duff--1.0 though, which
is good.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use?,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Andreas Fuchs, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Andreas Fuchs, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Which cscvs to use?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/16